Foundation
an intent map and conversation scenarios

Conversational workflows
We design AI chatbot workflows that help answer routine questions and route enquiries using approved information, clear scenarios, and defined quality controls.
This service is for teams that receive repeated questions about services, documents, products, or next steps and need a consistent route from the first message to a responsible person.
We review the audience, channel, real questions, available source material, and the decisions the bot must not make. The knowledge base and conversation map are approved before a prototype is tested on successful, ambiguous, and unsupported requests. Escalation to a person remains part of the design.
The final configuration follows the approved brief, channels, source materials, schedule, and rights framework.
an intent map and conversation scenarios
an approved knowledge-base structure and update rules
a chatbot prototype for the selected channel
quality checks, fallback behavior, and human escalation criteria
Use these examples as a starting point. A producer will confirm the actual production route after reviewing the brief.
Scope, inputs, timeline, approvals, and usage rights are confirmed for the actual project.
Scope, inputs, timeline, approvals, and usage rights are confirmed for the actual project.
Scope, inputs, timeline, approvals, and usage rights are confirmed for the actual project.


Open a question to review the production boundary before briefing the team.
We design AI chatbot workflows that help answer routine questions and route enquiries using approved information, clear scenarios, and defined quality controls.
Depending on the brief, deliverables can include an intent map and conversation scenarios; an approved knowledge-base structure and update rules; a chatbot prototype for the selected channel; and quality checks, fallback behavior, and human escalation criteria.
The bot must not invent prices, deadlines, links, or outcomes. Personal data, message retention, integrations, free-form conversation, and server-side processing require a separately approved technical and legal design. The final scope depends on the source materials, channels, test coverage, and ongoing ownership of the knowledge base.
A useful assistant knows its scope, relies on approved sources, and hands risky questions to a person. Conversation design follows real user tasks instead of showcasing unrestricted model output.
Common requests, permitted actions, prohibited promises, and mandatory human-escalation cases are mapped before implementation.
Current copy, services, prices, links, policies, and content owners form the knowledge set; conflicting sources remain separate until resolved.
Intents, answers, clarification paths, routes, and tests cover greetings, misspellings, ambiguity, and attempts to bypass the rules.
The handoff includes the working configuration, knowledge map, control scenarios, and limitations; integrations require an approved technical boundary.
Move from the current task to production, evidence, estimation, or project launch without losing context.
AI chatbots for consistent answers and controlled enquiry routing
Define users, recurring questions and the actions the assistant is permitted to take. Assign a source and an update owner to each answer. Public information, internal documents and personal data need different access rules.
Test precise and ambiguous questions, stale sources and missing answers using examples without unnecessary personal data. The assistant should state its limits and route unresolved cases to the responsible person.
Agree a change log, source-review schedule and a way to disable faulty scenarios. Test search and navigation first, then external actions separately. A chat response alone is not evidence that an operation was completed.